• About
  • Contact

The Triad Lawyer

~ Just a personal side of the law– opinions, ideas and thoughts.

The Triad Lawyer

Tag Archives: : trademark attorney winston-salem

King.com gets USPTO to approve Tm for “Candy” pertaining to videogames & clothing

22 Wednesday Jan 2014

Posted by triadlawyer in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

: trademark attorney winston-salem, Candy trademark App

The USPTO has approved King.com Limited’s request to register “CANDY” for videogames and clothing. Apple has begun sending out requests to developers that they remove their infringing App or provide proof of non-infringement.

This will make for some interesting caselaw as things progress. See attached link for more details

http://www.gamezebo.com/news/2014/01/20/king-has-trademarked-word-candy-and-youre-probably-infringing

W. Kirk Sanders, Attorney

Sanders Law Firm, PLLC

326 N. Spring Street

Winston-Salem, NC 27101

Telephone: (336)724-4707

Facsimile: (336)724-2077

www.kirksanderslaw.com

Candy Wars – Hershey Company opposes Mars’ trademark application for cross-section of Snickers bar

20 Wednesday Nov 2013

Posted by triadlawyer in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

: trademark attorney winston-salem, Sanders Law Firm NC

Candy Wars – Hershey Company opposes Mars’ trademark application for cross-section of Snickers bar

Mars Inc. is attempting to trademark a cross-section of their Snickers bar for use on in-store displays. The Hershey Company has filed an opposition to the trademark application claiming that the design mark is not distinctive, is functional and generic.

In their application, Mars claims that they have exclusively used “a cross-section of a candy bar showing layers within the candy, namely, a middle light brown layer containing tan-colored peanut shapes and a bottom tan layer, all surrounded by a brown layer.” Hershey points out that several companies manufacture similar candy bars and use a cross-section of the bar on their packaging. Therefore, Mars’ claim to exclusive use of such a cross-section is a misrepresentation.

Hershey also notes that many candy bars consist of nougat topped with a mixture of caramel and peanuts enrobed in a layer of milk chocolate, including Hershey’s TAKE FIVE® and ZERO® bars and Nestlé’s OH HENRY! and BABY RUTH candy bars. Therefore, the image is merely descriptive of such candy bars.

Because of the common use of these ingredients by Hershey and others, Hershey alleges that the cross-sectional image is not readily perceived by consumers as an indication of that Mars Inc. is the source of that candy bar. In other words, the image has not acquired a secondary meaning such that consumers only recognize and associate that image as a Snickers bar. Hershey takes it one step further and alleges that the image is a generic candy bar configuration that is incapable of functioning as a mark.

Hershey makes good arguments on all fronts. Unlike the clearly recognizable Snickers bar packaging, the cross-sectional image of the candy bar is not distinctively recognizable as a Snickers bar. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board will take up the matter soon.

Call Sanders Law Firm PLLC 336-724-4707 for your Trademark legal assistance

Recent Posts

  • NC Wildlife Hunting Lease Permission Form
  • NC Hunting on Private Land- written permission
  • Case Study in Losing Market Value- Schlitz in 1970’s
  • Treatment of boxwood blight in NC
  • 247th Easter Sunrise Service (Moravian Church Southern Province)

Recent Comments

Gene Rash on In memory of Steve Carlso…
E. H. Deisher on Life Estate Value of Real Prop…
Cynthia prater on In memory of Steve Carlso…
glenn johnson on Chrome Repair for Classic Cars…
ED CUTTILL on Chrome Repair for Classic Cars…

Archives

  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • September 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • December 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011

Categories

  • : Buena Vista Lot For Sale
  • business attorney winston-salem nc
  • condemnation attorney north carolina
  • estate litigation attorney north carolina
  • NC BBQ
  • nc eminent domain law firm
  • NC log home builders
  • post judgment collection attorney nc
  • Trust Litigation Attorney NC
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.

Cancel